
Hat tip Obsidian Wings blog.
![]() Stark County, Ohio ...Or, the perils of combining a venti bold Starbucks coffee and Prozac medication before delivering a public speech. Hat tip Obsidian Wings blog. 2 Comments ![]() Craigslist.org Censored It is not where you are, but where you are going. Analogies abound, which brings us to a couple of recent topics in the news: Censorship and Banking Policy. This week, several state attorneys general* threatened, Big Brother-esque, the management of craigslist.org to remove the adult services section of its electronic classifieds, as highlighted at TechCrunch and elsewhere. Craigslist initially resisted but eventually acquiesced by inserting “censored” on the section of concern – but only on its U.S. pages. Feel free to visit similar exotic services sections of other Non-U.S. cities such as Beijing for uncensored versions. End result, the tactics by civil servants to target one business and ignore many other popular online and print classified ads that arguably attract greater amounts of morally questionable activities should be a warning sign to citizens and businesses. That is all we will write about this topic, for obvious reasons. Another headline demonstrates how a government and banking community should responsibly manage their activities. Yesterday Beijing announced that it tightened residential lending standards by increasing the percent of equity required to obtain a loan from 20% to 40%. What a novel approach. In the U.S., lending standards went in the opposite direction, from 20% equity to zero equity. Did government entities and banks in the U.S. heed lessons from the banking collapse? Well, based on the recent sponsorship by Federal Housing Administration (FHA) of 3.5% equity loans for luxury condominiums in NYC, the answer is a resounding “no.” This presents yet another warning sign that policy makers and government entities are behaving in a harmful, irresponsible manner - a "privatize the gains, socialize the losses" mentality. ------------------------------------------------------- * State attorneys general espousing censorship: Arkansas, Connecticut, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia. ![]() Brown Capuchin Monkey Comedians from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) have hedge fund traders and financial bloggers snickering, including this must-read example at Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis. Some of their economic positions as committee members at NBER are highlighted in this Bloomberg article and summarized below:
Or, better yet, just hire a few brown capuchin monkeys from Associate Professor Laurie Santos, who runs the Comparative Cognition Laboratory at Yale University. Just saying. ------------------------------------------------------- Further resources: ● "Laurie R. Santos, Yale Psychology Faculty." Yale University. July 2010. Web. http://www.yale.edu/psychology/FacInfo/Santos.html. ● Laurie Santos: A Monkey Economy as Irrational as Ours | Video on TED.com. TED: Ideas worth Spreading. July 2010. Web. http://www.ted.com/talks/laurie_santos.html. ● Markey, Sean. "Monkey Research: Monkeys Show Sense of Justice." National Geographic News, 17 Sept. 2003. Web. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/09/0917_030917_monkeyfairness.html. ![]() The Illusion of Diversity, Philip H. Howard Assistant Professor Philip H. Howard of Michigan State University concludes that approximately 89% of beverage options are controlled by three corporations. Many people who haven’t been sleeping under the proverbial rock can name at least two of the three corporations. For those who cannot, the top three companies of U.S. soft drink sales are segmented as follows: (1.) 42.7%: Coca-Cola’s 25 brands and 139 varieties (2.) 30.8%: Pepsi’s 18 brands and 163 varieties (3.) 15.3%: Dr. Pepper Snapple Group’s 20 brands and 109 varieties Rounding out the top ten companies by market share (circa 2008) are the following (see beverage digest): (4.) 4.7%: Cott Corp. (5.) 2.6%: National Beverage (6.) 0.8%: Hansen Natural (7.) 0.7%: Red Bull (8.) 0.4%: Big Red (9.) 0.4%: Rockstar (10.) 1.6%: Private label and other The well-presented chart porn highlights the pseudovariety, or the illusion of diversity. ![]() 'W' Recession of Early 1980's In the past few days, several people and organizations have questioned whether the economy is falling back into a recession (double-dip or “W”recovery). The last double-dip recession in the U.S was the early 1980's. Our opinion is the economy never really recovered from the notable downturn beginning in late 2007, and for that matter never recovered from the 2001 recession (technology bubble burst). It’s our lost decade – in terms of economic growth, jobs and the stock market. Nevertheless, there are some lighthearted articles about the topic. Here’s a snapshot from Zero Hedge: You know we're headed for a double-dip when:
Our opinion? Psychology plays an important role: if you think you’re beaten, then you’re beaten. ------------------------------------------------------ Note: Footnotes for the first chart may be found at the link provided above (early 1980's at Wikipedia). To summarize, (1) blue line is percent change from preceding period in real gross domestic product (annualized; seasonally adjusted) and (2) red line is average GDP growth 1947–2009. Update 2 Sep. 2010: Given several have ask about further feedback about the ECRI, its managing director, Lakshman Achuthan, provides an overview in this interview on Yahoo! Finance. ![]() Many people viewed some of the games of the 2010 World Cup, including the championship in which Spain defeated the Netherlands 1-0. And, just as many people who were not at the stadium wondered what was generating the continual humming, bumble-bee sound. Well, it was the vuvuzela horn, and fans took liberty to explore the entire stadium space. From an economics perspective, the World Cup created a noticeable trickle-down effect. As you review the accompanying infographic (click image to enlarge), you will notice the large number of horns sold, which caused a large number of - you guessed it - ear plugs to be sold. Not all have been enthusiastic about the vuvuzela horns. Already, the horns have been banned at Yankee Stadium and throughout the Southeastern Conference (SEC) of U.S. college sports, among other worldwide venues. Given the positive economic impact attributable to vuvuzela horns, where’s the vuvuzelove? If you want to gain a better idea of why economics is sometimes referred to as the dismal science, then reference the 50 statistics about the U.S. economy highlighted on the Coalition of the Obvious (COTO) Report’s blog. The blog is anti-corporation oriented and the statistics are one-sided, but each has a link to source or support material to corroborate, so the article provides a concise one-page summary of statistics and links. Below is a sampling: #1) According to the Tax Foundation’s Microsimulation Model, to erase the 2010 U.S. budget deficit, the U.S. Congress would have to multiply each tax rate by 2.4. Thus, the 10 percent rate would be 24 percent, the 15 percent rate would be 36 percent, and the 35 percent rate would have to be 85 percent. #15) 39.68 million Americans are now on food stamps, which represents a new all-time record. But things look like they are going to get even worse. The U.S. Department of Agriculture is forecasting that enrollment in the food stamp program will exceed 43 million Americans in 2011. #25) In 2009, U.S. banks posted their sharpest decline in private lending since 1942. #26) Defaults on apartment building mortgages held by U.S. banks climbed to a record 4.6 percent in the first quarter of 2010. That was almost twice the level of a year earlier. #33) In Pinellas and Pasco counties, which include St. Petersburg, Florida and the suburbs to the north, there are 34,000 open foreclosure cases. Ten years ago, there were only about 4,000. #43) There are now 8 counties in the state of California that have unemployment rates of over 20 percent. #50) In 2010 the U.S. government is projected to issue almost as much new debt as the rest of the governments of the world combined. As Econgirl and many economists stress, correlation does not imply causation. Sure, our Dear and Loyal Readers might interpret our pontifications as harbingers of things to come and dutifully investigate further. Regardless, just because in March we highlighted more troubling signs concerning Moody’s Corporation (NYSE: MCO), doesn’t imply that said revelations caused the stock to plummet by 28%, from $30.23 (March 30) to $21.76 (May 11). We merely mentioned the behavior of savvy investors such as hedge fund manager David Einhorn at Greenlight Capital with respect to the investment attractiveness, or lack thereof, regarding MCO. Accordingly, the relationship between our revelations and the plummeting stock price is spurious at best. Nevertheless, some investors got a wake-up call after reading MCO’s 10-Q filed May 7, or by reading more recent posts by Zero Hedge, published May 8 and May 11, and EconomicPolicyJournal.com that the SEC is investigating MCO. Here is an extract from its 10-Q (bottom of page 20): “On March 18, 2010, MIS received a ‘Wells Notice’ from the Staff of the SEC stating that the Staff is considering recommending that the Commission institute administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against MIS…” Why MCO waited nearly two months to share this material information while Buffett was dumping shares is worthy of another blog post. Incidentally, didn’t another of Buffett’s investees, Goldman Sachs, also delay revealing its own ‘Wells Notice’ and other material information? The opinion at Coventry League and elsewhere is Moody’s may have difficulties as a going concern if the SEC enforces a cease-and-desist from being a ratings agency. In that case, some might want to paraphrase Friedrich Nietzsche: “Moody’s is Dead.” __________________________ Note: MIS is an acronym for Moody’s Investors Service, a reportable segment of MCO. In the past few years, investors and tax payers have been victims of securities fraud from WorldCom and Enron, to Bernie Madoff and the shenanigans of Allied Capital. Nevertheless, citizens continue to pay taxes to fund government regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to help mitigate or prevent such fraud. However, there has been a growing scrutiny by investors and citizens regarding the competency of the SEC. The SEC counters that it needs more funds from citizens to be effective. Well, in December 2008, ProPublica noted an investigative report revealing unacceptable behavior and predilections of viewing felonious pornography by several SEC staff, including senior officials earning annual salaries of $222k. The report and blog went virtually unnoticed until a few months ago when the Washington Times wrote about the SEC’s porn problem and more recently several bloggers and organizations including the Wall Street Journal, Huffington Post, TechCrunch, and Gawker provided further details of the SEC’s illicit behaviors. Interest rate spikes, currency devaluations, too-big-to-fails, the SEC and investment theses. These are just a few topics addressed by David Einhorn, co-founder of investment firm Greenlight Capital. Remember Mr. Einhorn? He is the manager who uncovered alleged fraud at companies such as Allied Capital and Lehman Brothers. Before everyone and their brother realized these allegations were substantiated with clear and verifiable facts, the messenger was vilified. Given this backdrop, what are some of Einhorn’s opinions and trades of recent? First, he is expecting a major currency collapse and a surge in interest rates in the next 3-5 years (see footnote below). This is evidenced by his large allocation to gold and comments citing imprudent government deficits, among other examples. Regarding the SEC, Einhorn is unyielding, opining in front of Congress about the SEC’s “crooked culture and lack of enforcement.” Furthermore, he does not leave doubt regarding his thoughts about too-big-to-fail companies: “break them up.” Edward Harrison, founder of the blog Credit Writedowns, summarizes these topics in an article at Seeking Alpha. For practical investment insights, Einhorn rarely disappoints. Recently he and other investors presented Vodafone Group (UK: VOD) as being undervalued (Jan 2010). Einhorn’s thesis is based on Vodafone’s 45% stake in Verizon Wireless. Essentially, the trade is considered a “5.5% Inflation Protected Bond with Free Non-Expiring Call Options.” Market Folly summarizes the trade, including the slide below: Lastly, it may be worth the effort to conduct due diligence on Moody’s (NYSE: MCO). Buffett has been dumping shares, while Einhorn has been increasing his short position... --------------------------- Note: Einhorn’s interest rate thesis does not contradict our belief presented earlier this year regarding near-term deflation. |