Coventry League
 
Picture
Growing Inequality by Bryce Edwards
Mother Jones magazine posted an informative infographic highlighting aspects of the U.S. economy from an inequality perspective.  Viewing it in its entirety is encouraged as it includes detailed sources and complements our prior blogs regarding perception (people actually perceive little economic inequality, when in reality it is severe) and owners of Congress (reasonable interpretation: major financial institutions).

Below is one illustration from Mother Jones. It reveals people's perception about inequality and social stratification in the U.S. (click image to enlarge).  The data are attributable to professor Michael Norton of Harvard Business School and behavioral economist Dan Ariely of Duke University.

Picture
It's the Inequality, Stupid | Mother Jones

As some might realize from the illustrations, there is a winner-take-all arena in which citizens and companies compete, with notable legal and political protections available for the winners.  To wit, companies considered too-big-to-fail and citizens in the top 1% got bigger and wealthier, respectively, since the beginning of the 2007 recession.

Notwithstanding, we are not attempting to address the factors exacerbating the economic inequality and malaise; rather, we are deferring to the opinion of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City President Thomas Hoenig who stated the following:

“I am convinced that the existence of too-big-to-fail financial institutions poses the greatest risk to the U.S. economy. They must be broken up. We must not allow organizations operating under the safety net to pursue high-risk activities and we cannot let large organizations put our financial system at risk."

And, if these references are not enough, then here are two more sources:
So, if we can form any lessons from the recent riots and revolutions in the past year in Greece and currently in the Middle East, one should be that social stratification and inequality can only last so long until there is a backlash from the masses to restore balance.

Or, as they say In mathematics: reversion to the mean.
 
 
Picture
Mulberry St., New York, N.Y., 1900
We wrote about the deflation versus inflation debate last year, and provided a couple of perspectives regarding how to frame, or define, the terms: namely, changes in money supply versus changes in nominal prices.

Today, Stoneleigh at The Automatic Earth provides a better and more detailed explanation in her post titled "Inflation for the Innocent, Hyperinflation for the Clueless."

 “It is not reality that drives markets, but perception, which is emotionally-driven rather than rational. If we assume markets will behave rationally, we will be wrong-footed every time.”

She also addresses the recent surge in commodities prices and acknowledges speculation, which is also described in this Bloomberg video about cotton hoarding in China.


 
 
Picture
The Storming of the Bastille, 1789
The Guardian presented a concise infographic titled "Arab youth: the tipping point" regarding key factors indicating potential youth uprisings.  Two criteria are (a) percent of population comprised of youths and (b) their respective unemployment rates.  The latter are stated values.  It is likely those rates are understated, as they are in the U.S.

Based on the data, some of the ingredients exist for further youth uprisings in Northern Africa and the Middle East.  One factor not included is population density, which seems to act as a catalyst, as witnessed in the densely populated Egypt (primarily Cairo region).

So, who is most likely to be next after the revolution in Egypt

Algeria.